Contact Us
About Us
History
Community
Sustainability
Recognition
Attorneys
Other Professionals
Articles
Articles Archive
Legal Alerts
Videos
Sign Up for Email Alerts
Media Center
Events
By Women For Women
For Attorneys
For Other Professionals
For Law Students
Business and Corporate
Health Care
Securities
Distribution and Franchise
Estate Planning and Tax
Real Estate, Zoning, Land Use and Development
Construction
Environmental
Agribusiness
Litigation
Electronic Discovery and Records Management
Municipal and School
Mediation and Arbitration
Government Relations
Labor and Employment
Intellectual Property and Technology
Family and Divorce
Criminal Defense
Personal Injury
Home printer-friendly YouTube facebook twitter YouTube
You Can't Just Fire Everyone... But Almost

Published: June 8, 2009
Author: Gesina (Ena) Seiler

What is the Brockmeyer Exception?
Wisconsin is an employment-at-will state, meaning you may fire an employee who doesn't have an employment contract for good cause, for no cause, or for a cause that is morally wrong without legal consequences, so long as you haven't violated some other protection afforded by state or federal law. Wisconsin, though, recognizes a narrow exception to the employment-at-will doctrine that prohibits you from firing someone who refuses to perform an act that violates a clear mandate of public policy. To sue for wrongful discharge based on public policy, an employee must identify a constitutional, statutory, or administrative provision that clearly articulates a fundamental and well-defined public policy and then demonstrate that his discharge occurred because he refused to violate it.

The courts have somewhat expanded the scope of the public policy wrongful discharge claim. Under limited circumstances, an employee who reports a violation of law may be protected against being fired. However, the courts have repeatedly stated that limited exception to at-will employment is not intended to be a general whistleblower exception, and they are still defining when a whistleblower-type situation fits within the public policy exception to at-will employment.

The courts have also allowed employees to make constructive discharge claims under the public policy exception. A constructive discharge occurs when you make someone's working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable employee would feel compelled to resign rather than continue working. The courts have been cautious in concluding that an employee has met her burden of showing she in fact was constructively discharged.

Bottom Line
Be very careful when you fire an employee who may have refused to perform an act that violates state or federal law. Although Wisconsin courts have repeatedly noted the narrowness of the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine, hard facts get a lawsuit before a jury. Jurors don't like employers they suspect of firing someone for refusing to violate the law.

Gesina (Ena) M. Seiler is an attorney in the areas of general civil litigation, insurance defense, medical malpractice defense, legal malpractice defense, municipal and school district defense, personal injury and employment law. For more information, contact Ms. Seiler at 608.283.6787 or gseiler@axley.com.

Axley Brynelson is pleased to provide articles, legal alerts, podcasts and videos for informational purposes, but we are not giving legal advice or creating an attorney/client relationship by providing this information. The law constantly changes, and our publications may not be currently updated. Before relying on any legal information of a general nature, please consult legal counsel as to your particular situation. While our attorneys welcome your comments and questions, keep in mind that any information you provide us, unless you are now a client, will not be confidential.