Contact Us
About Us
History
Community
Sustainability
Recognition
Attorneys
Other Professionals
Articles
Articles Archive
Legal Alerts
Videos
Sign Up for Email Alerts
Media Center
Events
By Women For Women
For Attorneys
For Other Professionals
For Law Students
Business and Corporate
Health Care
Securities
Distribution and Franchise
Estate Planning and Tax
Real Estate, Zoning, Land Use and Development
Construction
Environmental
Agribusiness
Litigation
Electronic Discovery and Records Management
Municipal and School
Mediation and Arbitration
Government Relations
Labor and Employment
Intellectual Property and Technology
Family and Divorce
Criminal Defense
Personal Injury
Home printer-friendly YouTube facebook twitter YouTube
Wisconsin Fair Dealership Case Law Update: The Dry Dock, L.L.C. v. The Godfrey Conveyor Company, Inc.

Published: June 7, 2010
Author: Robert Procter

Axley Brynelson's Distribution and Franchise Team publishes the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Case Law Update as an online resource for developments in the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law.

The Dry Dock, L.L.C. v. The Godfrey Conveyor Company, Inc.
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, June 7, 2010


Facts: The Dry Dock sells a wide variety of boats, boat accessories, docks and outdoor power equipment such as snow blowers, lawn mowers and chainsaws. Godfrey Conveyor Company manufactures pontoon, deck and fishing boats. The relationship between Godfrey Marine and the Dry Dock was limited: there were no defined territory, no exclusive agreements, no purchase requirements, no requirement to dedicate a certain amount of space for its products, no requirements to maintain a particular level of inventory, no requirements to purchase particular models and no requirements to operate in conformity with any particular marketing plan or standard procedure. Additional, the parties’ relationship only started in 2005 and Dry Dock only received 6% of its revenue in 2007 and 2% in 2008.

Ruling: The Court granted summary judgment to Godfrey Conveyor Company that Dry Dock was not a protected dealer under the statute because the facts did not establish the parties' relationship as a dealership as defined under the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law.

Bottom Line: This case is an illustration of the factual analysis done by courts when determining whether a distributor is a protected dealer under the statute.

For more information about the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, contact Robert Procter at 608.283.6762 or rprocter@axley.com.

Axley Brynelson is pleased to provide articles, legal alerts, podcasts and videos for informational purposes, but we are not giving legal advice or creating an attorney/client relationship by providing this information. The law constantly changes, and our publications may not be currently updated. Before relying on any legal information of a general nature, please consult legal counsel as to your particular situation. While our attorneys welcome your comments and questions, keep in mind that any information you provide us, unless you are now a client, will not be confidential.